Close
July 31, 2026
|
There are all kinds of reasons why client approvals drag on: scattered email threads, uncoordinated multi-stakeholder feedback, unclear decision-making power, version confusion, low approval priority.
The problem is that when approvals drag on, slipping deadlines turn what ought to be a smoothly running process into frustrating multi-day bottlenecks.
This isn’t a content problem so much as a workflow problem. The good news is that it’s fixable.
Too many stakeholders with no clear final decision-maker. With no single person taking ownership, multi-stakeholder feedback leads to uncoordinated, unclear decision-making that causes delays and watered-down results.
Feedback given too late or in vague terms. Feedback coming from various channels, given too late or in vague terms, erodes trust, creates confusion and leaves people wondering what’s really expected of them.
No shared understanding of what “done” looks like at each stage. Without a shared definition of “done” at the start of a task and at each stage, progress becomes unclear, work stalls, quality drops and people get frustrated.
Approvals happening over email or scattered channels. A marketing approval workflow that happens over email and scattered channels is another reason projects stall, version control becomes unclear and critical feedback gets lost in the noise.
Missed campaign windows and deadlines. This happens when nobody takes clear ownership of final approval, when new requirements are added without moving the due date, and when surprise stakeholders jump in late with completely different ideas.
Wasted studio and account time on rework. This drains budgets and delays the creative approval process. It also means rescheduling the marketing push or ad rollout because the project has passed its target date without launching.
Erosion of trust between agency and client. Projects that drag on are one of the most common reasons an agency loses a client’s confidence. Clients see the agency as disorganised, while agencies become frustrated by endless revisions and shrinking margins.
Agree sign-off stages and decision-makers upfront. This prevents costly project delays, scope creep and miscommunication. Mapping exact approval points and who has authority at each phase ensures accountability and clear progress from start to finish.
Use a single shared tool or platform for feedback. This centralises communication and ensures feedback is trackable from submission to resolution. It also prevents details from getting lost in separate email threads or chat channels. co.agency is an excellent example.
Set clear feedback deadlines and formats. The client opens one link, sees the post exactly as it will publish, and hits approve or reject, or leaves an online comment. Approved content flows straight into the schedule without needing to be moved manually.
Batch feedback rather than drip-feeding it. Sending work in small lots (one to two weeks) rather than a month’s worth all at once means feedback comes faster, problems get fixed earlier and changes get made sooner.